Font Size

SCREEN

Profile

Menu Style

Cpanel
Error
  • Error loading feed data

BOXINGACTION REVEALS POLITICAL CONSPIRACY IN THE LUDICROUS DECISION AGAINST IRISH BOXER MICHAEL CONLAN,

AS THE INCINERATING HEAT IS INCREASED ON THE AIBA BOXING RINGSIDE JUDGES WHO DECIDED

 RUSSIAN OLYMPIC BOXER VLADIMIR NIKITIN HAD BEATEN IRISH BOXER MICHAEL CONLAN.

Related image


BOXINGACTION HAS PULLED OUT ALL THE STOPS AND 
CONCENTRATED UPON INVESTIGATED THE MATTER. OUR CONCLUSION IS IT WAS A POLITICAL CONSPIRACY AGAINST RUSSIA.

Hwever, the Russians have proven smart and the winning/loser Russian boxer Vladimir Nikitin has been withdrawn due to injury. The injury appears to be a small cut on the eyebrow of boxer Nikitin.


Related imageIt is an insult to intelligence to suggest the highly capable Russian President Vladimir Putin would choose to commit a criminal fraudulent sport administration already under a dark cloud of suspicion to commit a criminal fraudulent act with the administration responsible for administrating.

 
Russian Ministers seen on TV come across as most competent and their views command respect. BoxingAction is made-up of Conservative minded people but the above abject failure Conservative Party members of Parliament to correct glaring mistakes and effect change is a serious concern.


Effectively, the retirement from the Olympic series ends what BoxingAction believes was an insidious attempt to seriously blacken Russian athletes and Russian people. The immediate spotlight of Western politicians is fiercely centred upon degrading Russia.
Is it believable the high grade politician President Putin would allow in the Rio Olympics the use of bribery of any description by Russian delegates, and thus give an excuse for the chronic disorder of the Rio Olympics to be blamed entirely upon Russia?
Once again inept Western politicians have made fools of themselves.’


To suggest an experienced politician with the standing of President Putin, with such capable advisers, would chose Olympic amateur boxing to commit a felony, withthe questionable AIBA, is in itself unbelievable.

However, it does indicate an obvious explanation why it would be chosen by lesser shrewd politicians.

Related imageEqually remarkable is the statement by AIBA the International Boxing Association) on this alarming situation of unacceptable judging by ringside judges.


Their statement claims AIBA has removed several judges from the Rio Olympics on August 17, because they had not met the organization’s standard of competence. 

This immediately raises the question: why were they appointed as ringside judges if they were incompetent?

This begs the question: were there any reasons considered to be more important than basic competence?

Related imageQuestions are being asked where are the seven five star judges,  Ireland’s Michael Gallagher, England’s Mik Basi, Kazakhstan’s Rakhymzhan Rysbayev, Poland’s Mariusz Gorny, Russia’s Vladislav Malyshev, Argentina’s Gerardo Poggi and Algeria’s Kheira Sidi Yakoub.

 Up until yesterday (August 17) the five star referees and judges had officiated at every day of the competition, featuring in many of the bouts in any given session.

There have been four years for AIBA to decide upon the correct judges for the Rio Olympic Games?

Is it not realised by AIBA administrators that events like the Olympic Games and other international boxing events are serious stepping stones for illustrious careers as World professional champion boxers?


One false decision by a ringside judge at a major event could torpedo the career of a young boxer through damage to confidence, cause depression or other valid reasons.

 

Related imageMichael Conlan is doubtful l if the measure will be enforced, adding that referee Kheira Sidi Yakoub is not one of those kicked out by AIBA.

 

Michael said, “I don’t think the referee was kicked out. She is part of the hierarchy of referees and judges. There are seven judges who pick who judges the fights. They are the top star referees.

 

 

“Even before the fight the referee said to me ‘keep your head up’. Why would you say that even before the fight, just as I had stepped into the ring?

“During the fight she was constantly on me saying ‘keep your head up Conlan and one more I am going to warn you’.

“When he was cut she was cleaning me instead of cleaning him. I just didn’t understand it. In the second round he was knackered and she was taking me over and cleaning me and then cleaning him, giving him extra time to get his breath back.

To me he was gassing. Thinking back on it now, it is annoying.”

Thes are very serious accusation and they demand investigating.

 

 

Another major question is who will replace the judges given the heave ho? An additional serious question is: who decided they, and all other AIBA judges, are fit and proper officials as ringside judges?

 


AIBA said its judging committee reviewed all 239 bouts from the first 11 days of the Olympic tournament. This committee determined, “less than a handful of the decisions were not of the level expected.” Really!

It doesn’t get better: BoxingAction has been told the banished judges apparently did not participate in two of the most prominent disputed decisions rendered in the Rio boxing series; this has to indicate there are incompetents posing as being competent.

AP has also reported that judges from both hotly disputed bouts continued to participate in Rio boxing matches on August 17.
Now comes the crunch statement: AIBA has decided regardless of any diabolical decisions, which may have been made, all results will stand. Is this the true way for boxing to be administrated in the classic Olympic Games?

In the considered view of BoxingAction this is an outrage. It is nothing more than a frivolous decision on a m

Related imageRelated imageajor problem and sanctions dishonest.

The association has declined to provide the judges’ names or the fights they judged, but said the results of all bouts will stand

 

 

  
It is a contradiction for AIBA to adm there were incorrect decisions but the results will stand and will be historically recorded as correct, when such results are known to be false.it

 


THESE FALSEHOODS MUST NOT BE ALLOWED TO BE GIVEN HISTORICAL VALUE!

By which standard is the AIBA statement to allow false results to stand based upon? 

Hopefully, not by those who are responsible for acting as amateur boxing ringside judges of quality, when they are proven by their superiors to be inferior and it is admitted they are guilty of making damaging historical judgements. ~

You are here: Home Amateur Boxing BOXINGACTION REVEALS POLITICAL CONSPIRACY IN THE LUDICROUS DECISION AGAINST IRISH BOXER MICHAEL CONLAN,